© Getty Images
Mercedes Team Principal Toto Wolff attended the Dutch Grand Prix Friday Press Conference. Here is the full transcript.
Q: Toto, let’s bring you in. P3 in the Constructors’ Championship, everyone back to work. What is your message to your racing team as we go into this second part of the season?
Toto WOLFF: Go for it. Well, I don’t know what Flavio said before, but clearly James’ perspective is the right one here. We’re embarking on a completely new set of regulations, and they’re extremely complicated. Nobody really knows where you’re going to fall out, and therefore you need to give it the highest priority. And at the same time, no racing team will want to give up a season. So how we try to do it is to deploy our trackside engineering team, a small group of engineers back at base, on that current project without bringing any more major upgrades, but really optimising the product, trying to learn as much as possible for next year. Also, there are certain variables and then there are certain topics which will continue – like the tyres. And we’re giving it everything to perform, but also, it’s all about winning a championship. Nobody remembers who came second, third, fifth or last. And that’s why you need to see the positives. The further down the chain you are, the more wind tunnel time you’re going to get for the following year. And that, under the new regulations, is of a massive advantage.
Q: Does the car – or the product, as you call it – have the underlying pace to beat Ferrari this year?
TW: There are big fluctuations in performance. You know, in this sport, we tend to be manic-depressive. One weekend, Ferrari is great, and everybody says, well, now they’re on a trajectory to challenge McLaren and finish second. And the next weekend it’s us again. I think it’s very difficult to predict.
Q: Now, I’m sure we’re going to hear who your driver lineup is in 2026 soon. But can I talk about a driver who has recently been announced as a Cadillac driver: Valtteri Bottas? What does he bring to a new team, do you think?
TW: Valtteri is a very, very interesting one because he had the fortune and misfortune to go against Lewis Hamilton as a team-mate when Lewis was at the peak of his game. James and I, we’ve been in this for a very long time. Valtteri has tremendous speed and is, in our opinion, one of the best drivers on the grid. Valtteri left the Mercedes team because we promoted George Russell – similar to Kimi today – a young gun that was with Williams for a time because he was in the junior programme and looked very promising. That was Valtteri. And since then, he’s dominated every team-mate he’s had in whatever car. I’m really happy. Obviously, we love Valtteri as a third driver and as a reserve. I said it before – if one of our works drivers were to have fish poisoning, we know we [can] put someone in the car that can be as fast and competitive. There is no compromise by putting Valtteri in the car on a given Saturday or Sunday. That obviously goes missing now because he’s going to Cadillac. But at the same time, we’re racers, and we love for him to have the opportunity of going back onto the grid in an exciting new project, and I’m sure he will shine.
If you like SilverArrows.Net, consider supporting us by buying us a coffee!
QUESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR
Q: (Leonid Kliuev – Grande Premio) Question to all three. Imagine you’re Graham Lowden, Team Principal of Cadillac, and you have four candidates for next year: Checo, Valtteri, Felipe Drugovich, and Mick Schumacher. Who would you choose and why?
TW: They all have pros and cons. I think what Cadillac went for is something you can understand. They went for experience. I don’t know how many wins and podiums there are between Valtteri and Checo, and I think for that stage of the project, it is understandable they did that.
Q: (Ivo Pakvis – Panorama) Question to Toto. Loyalty has been a very important factor in your team under your leadership. In a world that demands constant flexibility and adaptability, how do you maintain that flexibility in the context of that loyalty?
TW: Flexibility and loyalty – I think what’s most important in our job is to be transparent. I think Flavio’s always shown it – he says what he means. With drivers, it’s the same with us. Once you decide to embark on the road, this is what you do. You are open about it. For us as a team, integrity and loyalty are key factors. But that doesn’t mean you’re not flexible. Sometimes you need to readjust, recalibrate. There’s a change of circumstances. But most important is within the team to have an open conversation about these things.
Q: Luke Smith (The Athletic) Toto, I have a question for you on Valtteri. Dan Towriss said that you guys have spoken a lot through negotiations, and you were still going to chat further about what Valtteri’s availability would be through the remainder of this year. What are your thoughts on that? I know Valtteri will be on-site as reserve for the rest of the season, but how much freedom will he have to make a head start with Cadillac ahead of next year?
TW: As I said before, maybe sometimes I’m being a bit naive, but I want to do the best from a racing standpoint – the best for Valtteri whilst not compromising the Mercedes status quo. So, I think it’s pretty easy. Valtteri continues to be our reserve and third driver until the end of the season, and he’s giving it all. I’ve zero doubt that he’s going to do it with the utmost integrity. At the same time, I have no problem that he’s starting his job in Cadillac. It makes it easier that the regulations are totally different for next year. I’m happy. It was no problem for us to release Valtteri for the announcement and events that Cadillac did in order to present the drivers, and it will continue so during the year. I think Graham and Dan, with support from GM, this is a very strong and ambitious project – good for Formula 1 – and that’s why we want to do the utmost for them to showcase what they will be doing. And therefore, if we need to give Valtteri as a driver for events or for these purposes, no problem.
Q: Toto, would that include a test program for Cadillac in the second half of the year if that materialises?
TW: I haven’t heard of any test programme so far because they haven’t got a car. As it stands, we will always be supportive of Valtteri because those cars are so different next year.
Q: (Stuart Codling – Autosport) A question for Toto. Flavio has just shot the idea down, but the rumours don’t go away that perhaps Flavio, Christian, and Bernie [Ecclestone] might unite to buy the Alpine team. What would you make of coming up against a team potentially owned by Flavio, Christian, and Bernie? One of them a very old adversary and presumably it would be logistically quite difficult for you to live in all of their heads rent free?
TW: That would be an exciting story, I guess, and would create lots of buzz around Formula 1. I think we need that. Formula 1 has always been about the best racing, with exciting drivers and great personalities. And when you look back at the grand era of team owners and team principals – Frank Williams, Ron Dennis, Flavio, [Luca Di] Montezemolo, and a few others – maybe we need to work on that. And if there was such an exciting project, these three guys coming together – all of the mafia reunited – that would give good content, I guess.
Flavio BRIATORE: The sharks. The shark mafia.
TW: Three sharks.
Q: (Jack Smith (Motorsport Monday / MotorsportWeek.com) A question for Toto. Helmut Marko was quoted recently as saying that Kimi has been placed under a bit too much pressure perhaps by making his F1 debut with Mercedes. What is your response to that? And also, will the choice of third driver/reserve driver to replace Valtteri be based on how well he can help Kimi, given how much Kimi has said that he’s helped him?
TW: I think we have put Kimi under maximum pressure, to be honest. Looking at it now, I felt it was a great idea to have him in FP1 in Monza and present him there. That was maybe a mistake – not because he wasn’t capable of driving the car, because if he would have finished that lap without crashing, it would have been sensational and it would have built the confidence. That’s why. He’s in a Mercedes, he’s very visible, his results are very visible, his team-mate is great and is maximising the car. Therefore, he feels himself under the magnifying glass. The team – we just continue to believe in him. He needs time. We’ve embarked on this route, so you can say, “Was it right to put him under so much pressure by putting him in the team?” We’ve taken that trajectory; we’ve taken that route. We are fully on the mission, and single race weekends or a session like we had before is not going to change our opinion. Yeah, short term, we’re going to say, “that’s not good,” but Kimi is a long-term investment.
Q: Third driver?
TW: We haven’t figured it out yet. It’s super difficult to replace Valtteri. I mean, he ticks all the boxes.
Q: (Jon Noble – The Race) Flavio, you made a driver change earlier on in the season bringing Franco in. Are you now set until the end of the campaign with Franco? Is there a chance Mick could come back? And what was the thought process into 2026 for your second car?
FB: We make not so many changes. We changed, bringing in Franco Colapinto. And maybe Colapinto – the same problem as what Toto said – too much pressure to be in Formula 1. Last year, he had two or three races with James, where he did very well. But maybe to be in the team with a good driver like Pierre, and always in competition with the team-mate, maybe we put too much pressure on him. I think we need to consider that. Sometimes we believe… the driver is a human being and we need to understand what’s going on in the heads of these kids. These are young kids – 19, 20, 22, 23 years old – and I think it’s out mistake to underestimate the human part of the driver. We’re always looking at the timing. Maybe I missed something in the management of the driver, Colapinto. For the future, honestly, I don’t know.
TW: You can see the younger drivers in smaller teams, they perform, because it’s a totally different environment. The expectation is so low that you can only outperform. They are all high potentials for the future. But this is a big difference – being under the magnifying glass and the pressure that’s been created, and the expectations that are being set. It’s different.
Q: (Luke Smith – The Athletic) Toto, George spoke yesterday and he’s still very relaxed about his future and getting the contract sorted. He said you guys were willing to work through the summer, but he said, “I’d rather just take that time off.” There’s no rush, I assume. Where are you at with all of that? And do you just want to get everything right and dot the I’s and cross the T’s?
TW: Exactly like you say. George is a Mercedes driver since his junior years and Mercedes management. We clearly know what we expect from each other, what we want. It’s a formality. But at the same time, it’s important to discuss even the slightest details – how can we extract the most performance out of George? What is it we need to optimise on marketing days, for example? And it’s not the amount of marketing days, but it’s simply talking about a structure that helps him to perform at his best. These are the things. We haven’t discussed them over the summer because we felt we needed to just get out of each other’s face for a while, and we’re going to pick these discussions up. We have already picked up the discussions.
Q: (Jon Noble – The Race) Toto, there are some comments you made recently that have carried a bit of traction. Are you saying next year’s cars could top 400 kilometres per hour? Is that literally what your simulator’s saying or was it more just a figure of speech – a nice round number?
TW: Sounds good, no? Everybody’s talking those engines down, so I had to figure out – is there anything positive? And that is, if you were to deploy – obviously it sounds sarcastic – but if you were to deploy all the energy on a single straight, you could make those cars go 400 kilometres an hour. I don’t know if somebody got afraid by it, but you could. But there wouldn’t be much electric energy left for the few other corners on a circuit.
Source: FIA.com
